International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Study of Neo-Traditional Architecture of Hibualamo Traditional House Between Form, Function and Meaning Relationship as a Representation of Tobelo Culture

Hibualamo Neo-Traditional Architecture is a traditional building in the North Halmahera area built by the Tobelo tribe. The long history of the presence of the Hibualamo House is something important and symbolic for the people of Tobelo in particular and North Halmahera in general. However, it has since been restored in 2007 by the North Halmahera regional government. There has been a change or acculturation in architecture, both in terms of the use of materials, the shape of the building facade, and adjustments to the function of the building. This new application of hibualamo architecture has given rise to controversy over whether the existing hibualamo buildings still apply the cultural values of the Tobelo tribe, like the original hibualamo buildings. This research aims to examine the application of Neo-Traditional Architecture to the Hibualamo traditional house from the architectural aspect, namely form, function and meaning related to Tobelo tribal culture. A qualitative descriptive research method will be carried out by reviewing the literature on Neo-Traditional Architecture, Culture and Hibualamo Traditional Houses. Then the results of in-depth analysis and study will show the extent of the relationship between form, function and meaning that represents the culture of the Tobelo tribe. The research results show that the Hibualamo Neo-traditional Architecture is an architectural novelty, but its existence is still proven to be in accordance with the principles or cultural values of the Tobelo people of North Halmahera.

Hibualamo Architecture, Tobelo Tribe Culture, Neo-Traditional

APA Style

Ralf Mumulati, Noor Cholis Idham, Sugini. (2023). Study of Neo-Traditional Architecture of Hibualamo Traditional House Between Form, Function and Meaning Relationship as a Representation of Tobelo Culture. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 9(3), 105-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20230903.15

ACS Style

Ralf Mumulati; Noor Cholis Idham; Sugini. Study of Neo-Traditional Architecture of Hibualamo Traditional House Between Form, Function and Meaning Relationship as a Representation of Tobelo Culture. Int. J. Archit. Arts Appl. 2023, 9(3), 105-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20230903.15

AMA Style

Ralf Mumulati, Noor Cholis Idham, Sugini. Study of Neo-Traditional Architecture of Hibualamo Traditional House Between Form, Function and Meaning Relationship as a Representation of Tobelo Culture. Int J Archit Arts Appl. 2023;9(3):105-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20230903.15

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. J. Roosandriantini, “Terapan Trilogi Vitruvius Dalam Arsitektur Nusantara,” EMARA Indones. J. Archit., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 77–84, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.29080/eija.v4i2.267.
2. Y. Qomariyah, E. Dein, and A. Dwi, “Kearifan Lokal Pada Perancangan Kota Tua Tobelo,” Local Wisdom-Jurnal Ilm. Online, vol. II, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2010.
3. Q. Aini, “PERGESERAN DESAIN BANGUNAN DALAM MASA PERKEMBANGAN ARSITEKTUR DI INDONESIA,” Arsitekno, vol. 8, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.29103/arj.v8i2.4394.
4. C. Widi and L. Prayogi, “Penerapan Arsitektur Neo-Vernakular pada Bangunan Buday dan Hiburan,” J. Arsit. Zo., vol. 3, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.17509/jaz.v3i3.23761.
5. R. Tarigan and Antariksa, “Kajian Makna Fungsi Arsitektur Tradisional : Menuju Arsitektur Lokal,” Semin. Nas. Jelajah Arsit. Tradis. 2017, 2017.
6. R. F. Nanuru, “ONTOLOGI HIBUA LAMO DALAM PERSPEKTIF JÜRGEN HABERMAS,” J. filsafat, 2011.
7. A. Tohe, “PERAN HIBUALAMO DALAM PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK ANTAR UMAT BERAGAMA DI KABUPATEN HALMAHERA UTARA,” Al-Tadabbur, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 112–130, 2021.
8. A. Andiyan and I. Aldyanto, “Kajian Arsitektur Pada Massa Bangunan Masjid Cipaganti,” Sang Pencerah J. Ilm. Univ. Muhammadiyah But., vol. 7, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.35326/pencerah.v7i2.1092.
9. A. P. S.; Yuswadi Saliya, “PENERAPAN KONSEP ARSITEKTUR TRADISIONAL BALI PADA BANGUNAN MAYA SANUR, BALI (DCM),” Ris. Arsit., vol. 5, no. 02, pp. 117–133, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.26593/.v5i02.4728.117-133.
10. M. Wakim, “SASADU: ARSITEKTUR TRADISIONAL JAILOLO HALMAHERA BARAT,” Patanjala J. Penelit. Sej. dan Budaya, vol. 7, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.30959/patanjala.v7i1.78.
11. M. Sahril, A. Saputra, and A. F. Satwikasari, “Kajian Arsitektur Tradisional Sunda pada Desain Resort,” PURWARUPA J. Arsit., vol. 3, no. 4, 2019.
12. Z. Angkasa, E. M. Kamil, I. Iskandar, and M. A. Jaya, “Aspek-Aspek Arsitektur Tradisional dalam Landmark di Kota-Kota Besar di Indonesia,” Arsir, vol. 6, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.32502/arsir.v6i2.5466.
13. D. Rusmiatmoko and L. M. F. Purwanto, “FILSAFAT ILMU ARSITEKTUR TRADISIONAL JAWA PADA BANGUNAN SOBOKARTTI SEMARANG,” J. Arsit. Kolaborasi, vol. 1, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.54325/kolaborasi.v1i2.8.
14. D. R. Aprita and A. Anisa, “ARSITEKTUR TROPIS PADA TATA RUANG DAN PERMUKIMAN DI KAMPUNG PULO GARUT,” J. Arsit. Zo., vol. 3, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.17509/jaz.v3i3.26692.
15. ASHADI, Kearifan Lokal Kearifan Lokal. 2018.